13.6 C
London
Friday, September 24, 2021

COVID Conflicts: Asymptomatic Testing, Lack of Hazard to Children

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Ivor Cummins is a biochemical engineer with a background in medical system engineering and main groups in complicated problem-solving. On his web site, TheFatEmperor.com,1 he presents steerage on methods to decode science to rework your well being. In a podcast from December 11, 2020, he interviewed Dr. Reid Sheftall about SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

Sheftall is an clever surgeon, having scored within the 99.95 percentile on the SATs and off the size on his medical board and surgical board exams. He begins by explaining that the SARS-CoV-2 is simply 100 nanometers in diameter, which is smaller by one-fourth than SARS-2 virus, which is simply 100 nanometers in diameter, which is smaller, by one-fourth, than the shortest wavelength that we are able to see within the seen spectrum.

He is been utilizing social media to jot down essays about completely different features of the virus and the insurance policies that had been enacted due to what he calls “errors that had been made early on” within the pandemic. Listed here are seven of Sheftall’s predictions and corrections, together with the date wherein he made them, that are coated in additional element in the course of the interview:

  1. Sars-CoV-2 has an an infection mortality price that is the same as or lower than the flu (March 15).
  2. Masks will not scale back the transmissibility (March 15), however specialists nonetheless say they do.
  3. Lockdowns not solely is not going to work, however will trigger a lot dying and destruction, together with lack of jobs and insurance coverage, life financial savings and different assets, as much as and together with lack of life (March 17). Consultants are nonetheless lobbying to be used of lockdowns.
  4. We must always not shut faculties as a result of we do not shut them for the flu, which is a a lot deadlier illness than SARS-2 in that age group (March 18).
  5. The explanation the instances and deaths are so low in Asian nations is just not due to higher testing, tracing and lockdowns, because the specialists have stated and proceed to say, however is due to “immunity in place” on account of cross reactivity of SARS-2 with beforehand encountered coronaviruses. That is mediated by cross reacting reminiscence B and T cells, secretory IgA (August 10, not but confirmed).
  6. We’re not experiencing “second waves” within the U.S. They’re first waves in numerous elements of the nation because the virus marches by completely different local weather varieties in numerous areas (August 10).
  7. There usually are not 40 million instances within the U.S. There are not less than 160 million (October 17).

An infection Fatality Charge Has Been Mistaken For the reason that Starting

Early on throughout the pandemic, an infection mortality price claims various from 2.7% to 7%, with most being within the 4% vary. In keeping with Sheftall, that is “about 40 occasions too excessive” and ended up inflicting panic and worry within the public. He discovered the an infection mortality price was fallacious as a result of he observed one thing essential: The vast fluctuations in mortality charges did not add up:

“As a surgeon, we observed that surgical outcomes are very shut. From an excellent surgeon to a really mediocre surgeon, the mortality and morbidity may be very shut.

But, after I heard the details about what had occurred in Italy, the place 7%, supposedly, of the folks contaminated had been dying and in Germany, the place it was a lot decrease, I am pondering that does not make sense as a result of the Italians would name their German colleagues and discover out if one thing was being accomplished otherwise and alter one thing, and the speed ought to be very near the identical. So, I knew there was an issue.”

Sheftall steered that choice bias was getting used within the counting of instances, and organizations such because the World Well being Group and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention had been drastically undercounting the quantity of people that had been contaminated, which inflated the mortality price.

Sheftall seemed for knowledge wherein each case had been counted, ending up with a cruise ship, in which each and every particular person had been examined, and a small city in Germany that had additionally examined all residents. “After I crunched the numbers, the an infection fatality price got here out to 0.14%, so I knew … there have been some gross errors occurring.”

Sheftall posted his findings on Fb, solely to be instructed he was fallacious. He then wrote letters to Fox and CNN, hoping to share the knowledge with the general public, however he did not hear again.

“What occurred, sadly, is that everyone accepted these numbers as gospel, if you’ll, and proceeded to make fashions that had been means off. Epidemiologists appeared on tv, they usually had been means off.

The overall inhabitants, as I stated earlier than, started to panic after which the politicians had been capable of — and I am not saying they had been nefarious on this — however they had been capable of institute some insurance policies, which had been extraordinarily harmful … I do not suppose most of the people would have agreed to lockdowns, for instance, if they’d identified that the an infection fatality price is 0.1% … the identical because the flu.”

Different specialists, like Stanford College’s illness prevention chairman Dr. John Ioannidis — an epidemiologist who has made a reputation for himself by exposing unhealthy science — have additionally criticized global lockdown measures, saying they had been applied based mostly on flawed modeling and grossly unreliable knowledge. Like Sheftall, Ioannidis steered the an infection fatality price was truly 0.05% to 1%, with a median of about 0.25%.2

Shutting Down Colleges ‘Makes Completely No Sense’

Sheftall cites COVID-19 survival charges by age, posted by the CDC September 10, 2020, that are as follows:

  • Ages beginning to 19: 99.997%
  • Ages 20 to 49: 99.98%
  • Ages 50 to 69: 99.5%
  • Ages 70 and up: 94.6%

This interprets right into a 0.1% an infection fatality price, utilizing the CDC’s personal numbers — and the CDC is without doubt one of the companies that cited a 4% an infection fatality price early on. Sheftall could not discover knowledge on the survival price of school-aged kids from 5 to 17 years, however he did uncover that there have been 51 COVID-19 deaths reported in that age vary from March 1 to September 10, 2020.

“Now there are 56.4 million college students in elementary, center and highschool in the US so which means the probabilities by inhabitants, not by an infection however by inhabitants, are lower than 1 in a million per 12 months for a scholar at school, and that is essential as a result of we have shut down the colleges in America, which causes numerous issues,” he stated.

Given these numbers, shutting down faculties “makes completely no sense,” as he famous that yearly greater than 200 school-aged kids, on common, die from the flu throughout a five-month flu season. “So, if you wish to be constant … if you are going to shut the faculties for SARS-CoV-2 you could shut them yearly for the flu as a result of it is truly far more extreme within the school-age group.”

However closing faculties has penalties, as has been made readily obvious in the course of the pandemic. Interruptions in studying are widespread — “they did a survey in Boston and solely half the kids had been logging in” to digital studying, Sheftall stated, whereas others haven’t got cash for a pc or web connection. Different points that will have been picked up on in school, like issues with imaginative and prescient or listening to, or instances of abuse, may go unnoticed.

Asymptomatic Testing Goes ‘Towards Good Apply’

In keeping with The Atlantic’s COVID Monitoring Challenge, extra than 230.3 million COVID-19 tests have been performed within the U.S. as of December 20, 2020,3 which incorporates an unknown variety of assessments performed on folks with no signs.

The prices for such testing may very well be used for a extra productive objective, in accordance with Sheftall. Cummins additionally notes that “it is type of unethical and it is towards good observe” to check asymptomatic folks at such an enormous price. “The entire foundation of medication,” he says, is to check folks with signs so you will discover out what’s fallacious and deal with them accordingly. Sheftall continues:

“In 2017 to 2018 … between 70 and 80 million folks in America obtained the flu … no person observed for probably the most half and nobody was examined. I am a physician and I vaguely do not forget that it was a foul flu season. That was it. And but with COVID we’re testing so many individuals you would not consider it.”

Throughout a June 8, 2020, press briefing, Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Well being Group’s technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that asymptomatic transmission is very rare, which means a person who assessments optimistic however doesn’t exhibit signs is very unlikely to transmit reside virus to others.

A research in Nature Communications additionally discovered “there was no proof of transmission from asymptomatic optimistic individuals to traced shut contacts.”4 In the meantime, the COVID-19 assessments are problematic in and of themselves.

These optimistic reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) assessments have been used because the justification for maintaining giant parts of the world locked down for the higher a part of 2020, even if PCR tests have confirmed remarkably unreliable with excessive false end result charges.

A optimistic check doesn’t truly imply that an energetic an infection is current. The PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. Nevertheless, the genetic snippets are so small they have to be amplified with a purpose to change into discernible.

What this does is amplify any, even insignificant sequences of viral DNA that may be current to the purpose that the check reads “optimistic,” even when the viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive. In keeping with Sheftall:

“Once we see all these optimistic instances, a few of them are older than they’re letting on. They’re calling them new instances. The check seems for messenger RNA fragments within the oral pharynx, OK? It is the swab check. It is an antigen check, OK, versus an antibody check.

And people fragments can keep in there for months after the affected person has recovered. That is No. 1. And No. 2, consider the title — it is polymerase chain response. The PCR check is an amplification check. It could possibly take a tiny fragment and amplify it right into a billion fragments …

There are several types of immunological responses to a pathogen, one in all which is the barrier immunity. And you may have fragments of messenger RNA in your oral pharynx and have by no means gotten sick from the illness, by no means even registered on the size, no bullet, no sign, no nothing as a result of the barrier immunity injured the viruses early on and broke them into items, after which the PCR picks it up as a brand new check.”

Masks, Lockdowns Do not Work

Sheftall additionally compiled each day new deaths for six nations, together with the UK, France, Italy, Spain, Germany and Sweden. All of them have related dying curves, regardless of whether or not they instituted lockdowns or not. He additionally discovered a graph (pictured at 40 minutes within the video) wherein scientists in contrast the variety of instances in a area with how stringent the measures had been by the federal government, together with diploma of lockdown, group restrictions and masks mandates.

“You may see that there isn’t any reverse correlation such as you would anticipate … if the measures usually are not stringent it’s best to see extra instances, in accordance with their pondering … [but] it is the precise reverse of what the folks had been saying,” Sheftall stated. Actually, the graph largely exhibits decrease instances when much less stringent measures had been taken.

“It is the identical with masks introductions,” Cummins added. “Should you have a look at round 10 or 12 nations the place they introduced in masks mandates, there was no affect on the curve … in anyway so the empirical science of our personal eyes is screaming at us: Masks and lockdowns do not actually transfer the needle a lot, perhaps a little bit, however nobody desires to know. It is an ideology now. It is a faith.”

Sheftall studied masks utilization extensively and located masks mandates didn’t noticeably change the variety of instances or deaths the way in which they ought to if they really scale back transmissibility. Nations that used minimal masks weren’t worse off than neighboring nations with masks mandates.

“On account of statements by specialists and CNN commercials claiming that masks forestall viral unfold, mass hysteria descended on the world over the carrying of masks,” he stated. There have been instances of sizzling espresso being thrown in the faces of individuals not carrying masks, fines issued and different hysteria, over a measure that is not confirmed to work.

Actually, within the first randomized managed trial of extra than 6,000 people to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical face masks towards SARS-CoV-2 an infection discovered masks didn’t statistically considerably scale back the incidence of an infection. Amongst masks wearers, 1.8% ended up testing optimistic for SARS-CoV-2, in comparison with 2.1% amongst controls.5

Once they eliminated the individuals who didn’t adhere to correct masks use, the outcomes remained the identical — 1.8%, which suggests adherence makes no vital distinction.

Bringing within the Nice Reset

When the science flies within the face of the restrictions being imposed, it turns into clear that there is a sinister hidden agenda. Most of the international elite want this disaster and have been “fermenting panic for the previous eight months. Why they’re doing it you may argue however the truth that they are doing it’s plain and apparent,” Cummins stated, including:

“The WHO drove the masks when it was totally antiscientific. They are not silly, so why did they try this? The WHO equally is aware of the science on lockdowns and the analyses however they remorselessly lately pushed lockdowns once more … they’re imploring governments to lock down onerous, they usually should know that that is the fallacious factor to do.

So you may go to the World Economic Forum (WEF). They’ve made it clear that this is a gigantic alternative to herald the Nice Reset and to retool the world.”

Finally, Cummins believes there’s not one “single evil genius stroking a cat” that orchestrated a conspiracy, however relatively COVID-19 offered a chance that a number of entities have used to additional their very own agendas. What you are able to do now could be preserve your eyes open and your ears tuned to the science, so you do not fall sufferer to the pointless panic and worry they’re looking for to trigger:

“China actually exploited a brand new nasty virus and noticed it as an alternative to ship the fats, lazy, tender Westerners right into a tailspin. Why not? And the WEF has been very clear on its objectives, and it is remorseless in driving them.

The WHO, the U.N., the European vaccine alliances, you recognize, have plans for vaccine passports by 2021, they usually had been revealed a 12 months or two in the past. I imply think about you needed vaccine and well being passports by 2021 after which corona got here alongside.

Are you able to think about the way you’d really feel? You’ll salivate, you’d see an unlimited alternative to maneuver ahead lengthy plans and get them accomplished in six months. There isn’t any conspiracy idea. It is simply unlucky {that a} huge array of very highly effective our bodies all just about see huge alternative in Sars-CoV-2, after which all of them most likely, to higher or lesser extents, they speak to every different and talk.

So, it is like everybody’s obtained the large payday now and I believe what we see is the results of … this enormous remorseless normal push towards hysteria as a result of it can allow everybody’s objectives and the entire of the pharmaceutical business is salivating. It is simply a type of phenomena that sadly has been exploited past perception.”

- Advertisement -

Latest news

- Advertisement -

It’s time to abort Texas’s abortion legislation – and rather more

On September 1, the state of Texas applied Senate Invoice 8 (SB8) banning abortion after six weeks of being pregnant, together with in instances...

Abbreviated Pundit Roundup: COVID remains to be the highest story

Margaret Sullivan/WaPo: For one Capitol reporter, Jan. 6 was the ultimate straw — however he had watched a disaster brew for years “I’ve been overlaying the...

Clover Well being: Will Volatility Carry One other Brief Squeeze? By TipRanks

© Reuters. Clover Well being: Will Volatility Carry One other Brief Squeeze? Clover Well being (CLOV) inventory has witnessed vital volatility in 2021 up to...

Related news

It’s time to abort Texas’s abortion legislation – and rather more

On September 1, the state of Texas applied Senate Invoice 8 (SB8) banning abortion after six weeks of being pregnant, together with in instances...

Abbreviated Pundit Roundup: COVID remains to be the highest story

Margaret Sullivan/WaPo: For one Capitol reporter, Jan. 6 was the ultimate straw — however he had watched a disaster brew for years “I’ve been overlaying the...

Clover Well being: Will Volatility Carry One other Brief Squeeze? By TipRanks

© Reuters. Clover Well being: Will Volatility Carry One other Brief Squeeze? Clover Well being (CLOV) inventory has witnessed vital volatility in 2021 up to...
- Advertisement -